I used to have all 14, but not Zagloba or Mamai. You know, I actually have no trouble keeping all 15. The source data fed to program is the relationship matrix I dug up from the game’s. Since some might consider relationship information a spoiler I’ve put them behind spoiler tags. I wrote a short program that reads in the relationships between the different NPCs and finds the largest stable parties. With the new non-reciprocal system of likes and dislikes building the largest stable parties in WFAS is a much more interesting problem than in regular Warband. In regular Warband dislikes and likes were mutual, i.e. Since they tend to have lower morale they also suffer from slower campaign map speed. Unstable parties are also possible to keep together but are much more fragile when faced with adverse morale effects, with unhappy members often trying to leave the party. has at least two persons that she doesn’t like in the same party A stable party that is not strictly stable is not quite as resistant against low morale but is still quite acceptable.ĭoesn’t like another party member and has no friend to compensate, or have at most one disliked person in the group while also having a person that they likeĪ strictly stable party is a stable party whose members have no one they dislike in the group (equal to condition 1 of stable party).Ī strictly stable party has the best resistance against low morale and the fastest speed on campaign map. Have no person they dislike in the group, or how resistant the party is to low morale.Ī stable party is group whose all members either

The choices depend partly on how stable the player wants the party to be, i.e. The game has an elegant system of limiting the number of npcs present in the player’s party: the npcs do not get along with all the other npcs which means that the player has to make choices about whom to include in the party. Designing the largest possible stable parties is a nice little mini game in Warband.

Mount and blade wiki hero locations